Tuesday 22nd May 2012
Site best viewed in IE8+ and FF3.6+


firstimage
Close Me!

SpaceX 'Go' for 2nd Launch Try of Private Rocket Tuesday

Read more of this article in our forums

  • Image

    SpaceX 'Go' for 2nd Launch Try of Private Rocket Tuesday

    Read more of this article in our forums

  • Image

    'Ring of Fire' Solar Eclipse Occurs May 20

    Read more of this article in our forums

  • Image

    Transit of Venus

    Read more of this article in our forums


New Gallery! Come in and browse aroundalienmom


From the interesting to the downright bizarre!

SupernaturalUFO.com Forum Gallery



alienmom


We don't bite :)


An Interview with Fred Batt image


Resident interviewer Nicole scooped an exclusive interview for SupernaturalUFO with the one and only Fred Batt, more famous for his work on most haunted. Read the full interview by clicking below

Interview with Fred Batt




UFO Archive image


Visit our exclusive UFO Archive by clicking on the picture!


UN science report which stated Himalayan glaciers would melt within 25 years 'was a guess'

image

Claims by the world's leading climate scientists that most of the Himalayan glaciers will vanish within 25 years were tonight exposed as nonsense. The alarmist warning appeared two years ago in a highly influential report by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

At the time, the IPCC boasted that its report contained the latest and detailed evidence yet of the risks of man-made climate change to the planet. But scientists behind the warning have now admitted their claim was not based on hard science - but a news story that appeared in the magazine New Scientist in the late 1990s.

That story was itself based on a telephone conversation with an Indian scientist who has since admitted it was little more than speculation. The revelation is a major blow to the credibility of the IPCC which was set up to provide political leaders with clear, independent advice on climate change.

It follows the 'Climategate' email row in which scientists at the University of East Anglia appeared to have manipulated data to strengthen the case for man-made climate change. Dr Benny Peiser, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said: 'The IPCC review process has been shown on numerous occasions to lack transparency and due diligence.

'Its work is controlled by a tightly knit group of individuals who are completely convinced that they are right. As a result, conflicting data and evidence, even if published in peer reviewed journals, are regularly ignored, while exaggerated claims, even if contentious or not peer-reviewed, are often highlighted in IPCC reports.

'Not surprisingly, the IPCC has lost a lot of credibility in recent years. It is also losing the trust of more and more governments who are no longer following their advice - as the Copenhagen summit showed.'

Continue Reading Here source