Jump to content


Our new site has been released!

Hello everyone! If you've found us through one or more of our links on the web, you may want to take a look at our brand new Home page: www.supernaturalufo.com We pride ourselves on having one of the biggest back catalog of articles on the web, which is continually being added to. Why not take a look around and let us know what you think?

Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Admin : (24 May 2013 - 07:45 PM) @supersid, hey you get what you pay for! :lol:
@  Admin : (24 May 2013 - 07:44 PM) @Logan, did the earth move for you today??  :P
@  supersid : (24 May 2013 - 04:57 PM) Who tied you up ?????????
@  Loganinkosovo : (23 May 2013 - 06:52 PM) @Chris that's spelled "Awesome", not assume..... and "tied up is even better!
@  Admin : (23 May 2013 - 01:22 PM) @Logan, that would be a menage a trois I assume? :rolleyes:
@  Admin : (23 May 2013 - 01:20 PM) Just been kinda tied up with other stuff this past week or so but I'm back now  :D
@  Admin : (23 May 2013 - 01:16 PM) Because I say it's me, it's me OK????
@  supersid : (23 May 2013 - 09:15 AM) How do we know you are Chris?? felt bad ! Did you not ! Mmmmmmmm    B)
@  Loganinkosovo : (22 May 2013 - 08:36 PM) :)
@  Loganinkosovo : (22 May 2013 - 08:21 PM) Manage a ........ uh, never mind.
@  Admin : (22 May 2013 - 04:32 PM) Make that 3  :P  :lol:
@  supersid : (22 May 2013 - 06:56 AM) Logan ! I think everyone has left - it is just the 2 of us :unsure:
@  supersid : (18 May 2013 - 07:22 AM) Is there anybody there ?? Raining for Africa in Cullercoats !!   :wub:
@  Admin : (02 May 2013 - 07:56 PM) Too late! somebody turned the sun on today  :D
@  supersid : (02 May 2013 - 06:23 AM) It will cost you !
@  Admin : (01 May 2013 - 12:21 PM) Swap you for some rain???
@  supersid : (01 May 2013 - 05:47 AM) Good Day All - Sunshining off the Cullercoats shore !     B)
@  Evil Dolly : (29 April 2013 - 04:35 PM) peeks in
@  Admin : (22 April 2013 - 02:05 PM) Seems your leader couldn't give a damn either
@  Slaphappy : (22 April 2013 - 01:07 AM) God bless Texas, more people were injured and killed in that small town explosion than Boston,. funny how the news media picks and chooses whats more important.

New Update Issued on the 'Starchild Skull'


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Admin

Admin

    Co-Owner & Editor

  • Administrators
  • 15,061 posts
  • Location: UK

Posted 22 March 2010 - 01:33 PM

Posted Image


We finally have a recovery of nuclear DNA from the Starchild!

This past weekend I met with the geneticist working on the Starchild's DNA. He explained how he can now prove the Starchild is not entirely human, which has been our position for years. Now it is no longer a question of "if," but of "when" and "how" we spread this astounding new reality beyond the mailing list. First, though, let me bring the list's newcomers up to speed.

In 2003 we had a DNA analysis that used human-only primers to recover the Starchild's mitochondrial DNA, the DNA outside the nucleus, which comes from the mother and her genetic line. That meant its mother was human. But we could not recover its nuclear DNA, which comes from both mother and father, which meant its father was not a human. Unfortunately, with the recovery technology of 2003 we couldn't prove what he was, which left us in scientific limbo. The "no result" from the search for the nuclear DNA clearly meant Dad wasn't human, but we could not prove that fact beyond all possible doubt.

Now, in 2010, there have been many improvements in the recovery process, and those improvements have been applied to the Starchild skull with the stunning result you see below. This is a gel sheet that shows a clear recovery of its nuclear DNA, which could not be done in 2003.

The next two screen shots are taken from the national genetic database at the National Institute of Health, NIH. That public-access database is a centralized repository of all genetic information generated by geneticists all over the world, and now covers essentially all living organisms on Earth, from various kinds of viruses and bacteria, to various kinds of crustaceans and fish, to all kinds of animals and plants, including great apes and humans.

For many species, humans included, there are already nucleotide sequences covering entire genomes. Therefore, sequences from the Starchild's DNA can be directly compared against this vast database to look for any matches. In one such comparison below, you see the text below the blue line at the bottom (if you can read it, sorry it's so fuzzy) that 265 base pairs (a good length) of recovered Starchild nuclear DNA matches perfectly with a gene on human chromosome 1. This verifies beyond any degree of doubt that some of the nuclear DNA seen in the gel sheet is from a human being.

In the one below, and again at the bottom, you see the stunning report that in a string of 342 base pairs (another good length), "No significant similarity (is) found." To recover a stretch of base pairs as long as that with NO reference in the NIH database is astounding because it means there is no known earthly corollary for what has been analyzed! This incredible anomaly will put the Starchild in history books!!!

Source
VIDEOS CHAT GALLERY TWITTER HOME

Don't forget to visit our brand new HOMEPAGE for all the latest Supernatural/UFO news and more!

Had a UFO sighting? A story to tell? Found an interesting UFO/Supernatural link? Tell us about it

Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users