Jump to content


Our new site has been released!

Hello everyone! If you've found us through one or more of our links on the web, you may want to take a look at our brand new Home page: www.supernaturalufo.com We pride ourselves on having one of the biggest back catalog of articles on the web, which is continually being added to. Why not take a look around and let us know what you think?

Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  supersid : (18 May 2013 - 07:22 AM) Is there anybody there ?? Raining for Africa in Cullercoats !!   :wub:
@  Admin : (02 May 2013 - 07:56 PM) Too late! somebody turned the sun on today  :D
@  supersid : (02 May 2013 - 06:23 AM) It will cost you !
@  Admin : (01 May 2013 - 12:21 PM) Swap you for some rain???
@  supersid : (01 May 2013 - 05:47 AM) Good Day All - Sunshining off the Cullercoats shore !     B)
@  Evil Dolly : (29 April 2013 - 04:35 PM) peeks in
@  Admin : (22 April 2013 - 02:05 PM) Seems your leader couldn't give a damn either
@  Slaphappy : (22 April 2013 - 01:07 AM) God bless Texas, more people were injured and killed in that small town explosion than Boston,. funny how the news media picks and chooses whats more important.
@  supersid : (21 April 2013 - 02:11 PM) I am going to Google " Bing "   ;)
@  Admin : (20 April 2013 - 01:20 PM) Let me tell you. How it will be. There's one for you, Nineteen for me..... B)
@  supersid : (20 April 2013 - 12:53 PM) Thats not love - thats extortion  B)
@  Loganinkosovo : (20 April 2013 - 02:01 AM) The Tax Man loves you, Sid.
@  supersid : (19 April 2013 - 09:35 AM) :D  :lol:  B)  ;)  :huh:  :o  :wub:  :wub:
@  supersid : (19 April 2013 - 09:34 AM) I would like to know who loves me ??
@  Admin : (18 April 2013 - 07:26 PM) BINGloves us  :)
@  supersid : (18 April 2013 - 07:17 PM) I was waiting for that response - The truth please  :P
@  Admin : (18 April 2013 - 04:43 PM) Or, there's always Boing!!!
@  Admin : (18 April 2013 - 04:38 PM) Crosby??  :wacko:
@  supersid : (18 April 2013 - 04:17 PM) BING ! Who is Bing ???? :unsure:  :unsure:
@  supersid : (16 April 2013 - 03:03 PM) Admin is in the house ! must behave !      :D

Christmas card snowflakes 'corrupt nature' by defying laws of physics


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Nicole

Nicole

    Super Mod

  • Moderators
  • 4,114 posts
  • Location: Huddersfield

Posted 23 December 2009 - 07:38 PM

Posted Image

The fragile truce between science and art came under strain today when common depictions of snowflakes threatened to divide the two cultures over the festive season.

In the latest salvo between the warring factions, Christmas card manufacturers, advertising agencies and children's book publishers are accused of corrupting nature with "incorrect designer versions" of snowflakes that defy the laws of physics.

A letter to the prestigious journal Nature calls on scientists to take a stand against all images of four, five and eight-sided "faux" snowflakes.

Professor Thomas Koop, who specialises in ice crystal formation at the University of Bielefled in Germany, had turned a blind eye to the depiction of unnatural snowflakes until he noticed an octagonal one on Nature's own marketing website, captioned "... for anyone who loves science."

Koop decided to make his frustration known. "It bugs me," Koop told the Guardian. "It's the molecular building blocks that shape these crystals and they can't form any shape other than a hexagon."

In a letter to Nature, Koop points out that the hexagonal shape of snowflakes has been known for at least 400 years when Johannes Kepler, the German astronomer, published his mini-treatise on the subject, "On the six-cornered snowflake".

"Beautiful photographs abound, including those taken by Vermont farmer Wilson A Bentley starting in 1885 ... Why then do many artists invent their own physically unrealistic snow crystals?"

Source




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users